Tag Archives: #ClassicCinema

Chaplin, Pickford, Fairbanks, Griffith: United Artists (1919) and the Rise of Artist-Controlled Cinema.

FEATURE image: United Artists founders in 1919, (Left to right) Douglas Fairbanks (1883-1939), Mary Pickford (1892-1979). Charlie Chaplin (1889-1977) and D.W. Griffith (1875-1948). 

United Artists was a revolutionary artist-controlled film company founded in 1919 by Hollywood’s biggest stars that challenged the power of the traditional studio system and pioneered the independent producer-driven business model that eventually became standard throughout the film industry.

By John P. Walsh

It is debated whose brainchild the United Artists Corporation (UA), founded in 1919, ultimately was. Was it Mary Pickford’s and Douglas Fairbanks’ theatrical lawyer and a later UA executive who advised them to found an artist-controlled movie company or UA’s first president, a former U.S Treasury Department official, who suggested Douglas Fairbanks start a distribution company for his films or was it a publicity man for one of the majors who suggested to UA’s first general manager to create a movie studio run by artists for artists – or, finally, was it, as Charlie Chaplin claimed, by way of his elder half-brother Sydney who had hired a pretty girl to spy on another studio’s imminent potential merger and whose culled information led directly to founding their own?1 Whatever or whoever was the conduit or original source, in 1919, four of Hollywood’s legendary film artists — actors Douglas Fairbanks (1883-1939), Fairbanks’ future wife, Mary Pickford (1892-1979), Charlie Chaplin (1889-1977), and “the Father of Film Technique” director D.W. Griffith (1887-1948)- formed United Artists, one of Hollywood’s name-brand film studios.

Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and D.W. Griffith founded United Artists in 1919 to gain control over the production, distribution, and profits of their films rather than remain dependent on major studios.

In April 1918 Douglas Fairbanks, Mary Pickford, and Charlie Chaplin, traveled the country selling Liberty Loans (war bonds). The adulation these stars received everywhere during the tour worked to convince them and others that it was time for them to establish an artist-controlled movie studio which occurred months later in February 1919. Public Domain.

Distinct from other movie studios, UA was especially founded by artists for artists. From His Majesty, The American in 1919 starring Douglas Fairbanks that premiered in New York City at the newly-built Capitol through to The Underdoggs scheduled for 2024, a comedy starring Snoop Dog – and many hundreds of major motion pictures in between – United Artists’ impact on the entertainment industry and culture has been highly significant in that its range of film product envisioned and presaged the artist/ producer-driven film industry that is normal today. Yet United Artists was also more as it allowed independents to make their films free of heavy-handed interference from the higher ups which was often the case at the majors. Such freedom in the marketplace could be risky and United Artists’ survival through the decades is nothing other than extraordinary.

United Artists was created by artists for artists, with the goal of protecting creative freedom and resisting the growing concentration of power among Hollywood studios and distributors.

Alexandria Hotel in downtown Los Angeles where Pickford, Chaplin, Fairbanks and Griffith met in the dining room in January 1919 to finalize plans for the founding of their artist-controlled movie studio called United Artists. Built in 1906, the Alexandria Hotel was a relatively new hotel in 1919 sitting on the southwest corner at 501 South Spring Street. “Alexandria Hotel (Los Angeles)” by Los Angeles is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

The following artist corporate manifesto was released to the press on February 5, 1919. Over 100 years later it remains prescient for many reasons including a warning about the use of technology in filmmaking (“machine-made entertainment”) and freedom of choice for the consumer in terms of viewership (“not force[ing] upon him program films he does not desire”) – A new combination of motion picture stars and producers was formed yesterday, and we, the undersigned, in furtherance of the artistic welfare of the moving picture industry, believing we can better serve the great and growing industry of picture productions, have decided to unite our work into one association, and at the finish of existing contracts, which are now rapidly drawing to a close, to release our combined productions through our own organization. This new organization, to embrace the very best actors and producers in the motion picture business, is headed by the following well-known stars: Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, William S. Hart, Charlie Chaplin and D.W. Griffith productions, all of whom have proved their ability to make productions of value both artistically and financially. We believe this is necessary to protect the exhibitor and the industry itself, thus enabling the exhibitor to book only pictures that he wishes to play and not force upon him (when he is booking films to please his audience) other program films which he does not desire, believing that as servants of the people we can thus serve the people. We also think that this step is positively and absolutely necessary to protect the great motion picture public fromthreatening combinations and trusts that would force upon them mediocreproductions and machine-made entertainment.2

A Vision Ahead of Its Time

In a short 30 years, by the early 1950’s, with the demise of the studio system and the rise of broadcast television, UA would bring this visionary independent investor and producer driven film product to the world as the business template for how all films in and outside of Hollywood would be made.

From Prestige Studio to Industry Model

In 1919, United Artists was originally conceived as a prestige studio that distributed some of the industry’s best larger budget pictures. By the 1940’s it had evolved to add less expensive film products that met audience demands and kept the studio’s distribution networks humming. As capital and power tends towards concentration in a capitalist economy, the notion for a nimble, relatively low overhead movie-making patron facilitating production planning and distribution of films by independent producers proved a vital idea whose relevancy renewed itself through the years.3

A Different Kind of Studio

In contrast to the major studios, such as MGM, Paramount, Fox, RKO, and Warner Bros., which had production, distribution and exhibition arms, United Artists focused solely on distribution. Unlike the majors, United Artists had no star stable, no studio facilities to speak of, no directors, no technicians, no chain of theaters, no house style, but, functioned as a distribution outlet for independently-made productions.

The Business of Distribution

In that way, UA was responsible for all phases of an independent production company’s film releases. This included the layers of market testing desired, the planning (including some financing) and booking of production releases, sundry marketing, and settlement matters following release. Distribution duties ranged from pre-production to marketing assistance as well as a bird’s-eye evaluation during production.

Getting Films to the Screen

Post-production distribution of motion pictures to the country 23,000 theatres in the 1930’s was an umbrella term for what was really a chain of complex business actions starting at the beginning of a film project to its being shown flickering on a local screen.

Unlike MGM, Paramount, Fox, Warner Bros., and other major studios, United Artists operated primarily as a distribution company for independent producers rather than maintaining its own large production infrastructure.

In the beginning: the 1920’s.

Throughout the silent era’s heyday and ultimate demise—the 1920’s—UA was clearly distributing films of its four founders which was a large reason for the company’s genesis. This soon included bankable silent film stars, such as Gloria Swanson (1889-1983). Lillian Gish (1893-1993), Buster Keaton (1895-1966) and Norma Talmadge (1894-1957). UA had no shortage of money-making hits in the roaring ‘20’s. There were melodramas such as Griffith’s Broken Blossoms (1919) to his Way Down East (1921) and comedies starring Mary Pickford, including Pollyanna (1920) and Little Annie Rooney (1925). Douglas Fairbanks starred in UA crowd-pleasers in roles that in the 1930’s sound era was played by Errol Flynn, such as The Mark of Zorro (1920), The Three Musketeers (1921), Robin Hood (1923) and The Thief of Bagdad (1924).

Douglas Fairbanks, Sr. was a swashbuckling film hero of the 1920’s. Made for $2 million, The Thief of Bagdad in 1924 was the most expensive movie ever made up to that time. Douglas Fairbanks Pictures had simply outdone itself since his 1922 silent film, Robin Hood, made for $1.5 million had been the most expensive motion picture ever made (see – Tino Balio, Grand Design: Hollywood As A Modern Business Enterprise, 1930-1939, New York: Scribner’s Sons, 1993, p. 205). For The Thief of Bagdad, based on the Arabian Nights stories, there were monumental sets constructed – and a fantastic magic carpet ride- which set a new standard for Hollywood production values. In a United Artists’ picture directed by Raoul Walsh (1887-1980), Fairbanks played the lead role of Ahmed the Thief, an exotic athletic romantic role. In this leading man type, Fairbanks was joined by Rudolph Valentino (1895-1926), Ramon Novarro (1899-1968), John Barrymore (1882-1942), John Gilbert (1897-1936), Ronald Colman (1891-1951) and Gilbert Roland (1905-1994). Usually playing opposite sexy, mysterious heroines such as Greta Garbo (1905-1990) and Vilma Banky (1901-1991), Douglas Fairbanks played opposite Julanne Johnston (1900-1988) in this silent action film. Douglas Fairbanks Sr.” by twm1340 is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

United Artists’ 1924 silent classic, The Thief of Bagdad, was written, produced and starring Douglas Fairbanks.

Mary Pickford in 1920 in Los Angeles. Pickford was “America’s Sweetheart” and one of the highest paid film stars of the silent era. Pickford made about 50 feature films over which she exercised complete control. As a cofounder of United Artists Pickford exercised direct influence over scores of Hollywood releases for more than 30 years. Portrait by Nelson Evans. Public Domain.

Master of film technique, D.W. Griffith, with Dorothy and Lillian Gish. In 1908 Griffith was paid $5 a day as a scene writer and actor. Seven year later, in 1915, with Griffith’s Birth of a Nation the film director was a millionaire. Made for $100,000, that film generated $18 million at the box office (see – Tino Balio, “Stars in Business: The Founding of United Artists” in The American Film Industry, ed. Tino Balio, University of Wisconsin Press, 1976, p.144). “D.W.Griffith, Dorothy & Lilian Gish” by oneredsf1 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Lillian Gish in 1922 by an unknown photographer. In D.W. Griffith’s Broken Blossoms released by United Artists in 1919, Gish plays young girl, Lucy Burrows, who is abused by her alcoholic prizefighting father, and who meets Cheng Huan, a kind-hearted Chinese man who falls in love with her. In a film career that spanned from 1912 to 1987 – including a directorial debut in 1920 – Gish was called the “First Lady of American Cinema.” “Lillian Gish by unknown photographer, ca. 1922” by trialsanderrors is licensed under CC BY 2.0. Public Domain.

Screenshot of Buster Keaton in The General, released by United Artists in 1927. The film was an example of a speculative bare bones film studio gone awry. UA president Joseph Schenck had lent Buster Keaton productions (his brother-in law) $750,000 for the silent action film that essentially broke even and prompting UA’s facilitating Buster Keaton’s move to a more watchful MGM for future projects. Public Domain.

The studio became a home for some of the biggest filmmakers and stars of the twentieth century, including Gloria Swanson, Buster Keaton, Samuel Goldwyn, Walt Disney, David O. Selznick, and many others.

Gloria Swanson, born in Chicago, was, at 26 years old, considered the most bankable silent film star of the time. In a successful career in film since 1918, she signed with United Artists in 1925 with UA chairman of the board Joseph Schenck who was brought in the year before. It was a six-picture distribution deal, and her production company was advanced financial loans through United Artists’ own Art Cinema Corporation subsidiary. Swanson also agreed to invest in UA by buying $100,000 of preferred stock. These financial terms proved difficult for Swanson to repay later and required the services of financier Joseph P. Kennedy (1888-1969) who reconfigured her business portfolio to meet her obligations and produced one of her films.4 Meanwhile, her UA debut, The Love of Sunya, basically broke even. Swanson made two other UA films that were critical and financial successes –Sadie Thompson in 1927 with director Raoul Walsh (1887-1980) and The Trespasser, one of Swanson’s few sound films. The latter was directed by Edmund Goulding (1891-1959) and produced by Kennedy in 1929. For both of these films, Gloria Swanson received Academy Award nominations for Best Actress.

Gloria Swanson, c. 1923. Swanson signed with UA for a six-picture deal. Though the actress adapted well to talkies, Swanson remained the consummate silent screen film star. “smokin turban gloria swanson, c.1923” by carbonated is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0. Public Domain.

Kennedy family, c. 1923. Joseph P. Kennedy, an imaginative and successful businessman, was the  financial advisor to Gloria Swanson in 1927 and film producer for Queen Kelly, a United Artists release, in 1928. The future president of the United States, John F. Kennedy, is seated to the left. Public Domain.

English film director Edmund Goulding (1891-1959) helping William Twiddy and “Bill” Easton kiss while making a film in 1927. Public Domain.

As its founders first looked to protect their public image and screen product, United Artists opened its doors to an array of outside suppliers expanding their business operations. In 1929 UA produced 18 pictures – a company record – and, in the next few years, was expanding to distribute films of Samuel Goldwyn, Howard Hughes, Joseph Schenck, Walt Disney, Alexander Korda, David O. Selznick, and Walter Wanger, among others. With the onset of talkies in 1927 and the Great Depression in 1929 the new pressures on the movie studios were enormous.

Best of Times, Worst of Times: The 1930’s.

While having built their reputation on silent film stars and watching their film output dwindle 25% in the early 1930’s, UA benefited from the management of Joseph Schenck (1876-1961) who facilitated the release of several popular money-making features by Samuel Goldwyn (Palmy Days), Howard Hughes (The Front Page – nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture), Charlie Chaplin (City Lights) and Alexander Korda (The Private Life of Henry VIII).5

 

Actor Toby Wing (1915-2001) was an actress and showgirl, once called “the most beautiful chorus girl in Hollwood.” In 1931 she became one of the first Goldwyn Girls and started her film career in Palmy Days (1931), a United Artists release starring Eddie Cantor. In 1933, she was the blonde in 42nd Street in the ‘Young and Healthy’ number with Dick Powell – a film that singlehandedly saved Warner Bros. in the throes of the Great Depression. Sam Goldwyn, imitating the Ziegfeld Follies, looked to create a chorus line for his films where the producer insisted each actress in the Goldwyn line-up “must look as though she had just stepped out of a bathtub. There must be a kind of a radiant scrubbed cleanliness about them which rules out all artificiality.” In a memorable if short film career – Toby Wing retired at 23 years old – her roles were small, often uncredited, and, before the introduction of the Production Code in 1934, frequently risqué. In 1934 she played Consuelo of Claghorne to Cary Grant’s Dr. Maurice Lamar in Paramount Pictures’ rom-com, Kiss and Make-Up and, in 1937, in True Confession, starring Carole Lombard. When, in 1938, at 22 years old, she married “Dick” Merrill, a dashing airmail pilot 20 years her senior, observers didn’t expect the union to last. Wing promptly retired from show business and the newlyweds moved to Florida where Merrill had a reliable Florida-to-New York City route. Wing had two children with Merrill, became a successful real estate agent and the couple stayed together for 44 years until Merrill’s death in 1982. While Toby Wing may have been one more zany platinum blonde that Hollywood and its audiences adored, she possessed an on-screen radiance that found her honored in 1960 with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Toby Wing died in 2001 at 85 years old. “Toby Wing; (1915 – 2001)” by Movie-Fan is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Adolphe Menjou (1890-1963) starred as newspaper editor Walter Burns in The Front Page produced by Howard Hughes and distributed by United Artists in 1931. When the remake of the film by Howard Hawkes was released in 1940 by Columbia Pictures, it was renamed “His Girl Friday” with Cary Grant in the Walter Burns role. For his performance in 1931, Adolphe Menjou as Walter Burns received an Academy Award nomination as Best Actor. “Adolphe Menjou” by twm1340 is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Charlie Chaplin’s City Lights (1931) released by his United Artists –here with Virginia Cherrill (1908-1996) as the visioned-impaired flower girl – was a silent film though made in an era when talkies were most wildly popular. While a tender relationship blossomed between Chaplin’s tramp and the flower girl in the film, on the set, in real life, Chaplin almost fired Cherrill for not meeting his threshold for professionalism. Ultimately, Chaplin didn’t follow through on his threat because it would be prohibitively expensive to find and film a replacement. Independent film production companies, even when it is a famous star and movie studio owner, often had to follow a tighter budget than the majors. “City Lights,” one of Chaplin’s classic films, became one of that year’s blockbusters and helped UA make money during the Great Depression. “City Lights” by Mgmax is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

United Artists released many landmark films across the silent era, Golden Age Hollywood, and modern cinema, helping shape American film culture for decades.

Building a Smarter Business Model

In 1926, Joseph Schenck made a visionary move when he established the United Artists Theatre Circuit, selectively acquiring first-run theaters in major markets to exhibit UA films. The strategy strengthened United Artists’ position in the industry and encouraged the major studios to work more cooperatively with a formidable competitor while also showing UA productions in their own theaters.

A Lean Studio in Hard Times

Unlike MGM, Paramount, Warner Bros., Fox, and RKO, United Artists did not own a vast theater chain. Collectively, those major studios controlled approximately 15 percent of the nation’s theaters. Yet UA’s lack of extensive theater holdings proved advantageous during difficult economic times. When the Great Depression caused declines in movie attendance and real estate values, United Artists was less exposed to the financial losses suffered by the vertically integrated majors.

The company’s lean organizational structure also resulted in lower operating costs. With a smaller staff and fewer fixed expenses, United Artists was better positioned to weather economic downturns and avoid the large-scale layoffs that affected many competitors.

New Approaches to Film Financing

Under Schenck’s leadership, United Artists expanded beyond traditional lending arrangements and began investing directly in future productions through profit-sharing agreements. This approach supplemented the company’s existing practice of advancing funds to producers who repaid loans with interest after a film’s release (Gloria Swanson’s deal). Such financing arrangements helped attract independent filmmakers while allowing UA to share in the success of profitable productions.

The Twentieth Century Partnership

In 1933, Schenck joined forces with Darryl F. Zanuck (1902-1979), formerly of Warner Bros., to create Twentieth Century Pictures. The partnership quickly became one of United Artists’ principal production sources, and Twentieth Century Pictures supplied most of UA’s films in 1933 and 1934.

However, after Schenck was denied a partnership position at United Artists in 1935, he departed the company.6 He then merged Twentieth Century Pictures with Fox Films to form Twentieth Century-Fox, becoming chairman of the new studio.

Leadership Vacuum and Talent Drain

Schenck’s departure created a major challenge for United Artists. The loss of its leading producer left the company without strong executive leadership, a situation that arguably was not fully resolved until the arrival of Arthur Krim and Robert Benjamin in the 1950s.

Following Schenck’s exit, several prominent filmmakers and producers gradually left the company. Although such movement was common in the motion picture industry, particularly among independent-minded figures seeking new opportunities, the departures weakened United Artists’ creative base. Walt Disney moved to RKO in 1936, Samuel Goldwyn followed in 1940, and William Wanger departed for Universal Pictures in 1941.

Searching for a New Future

Only after World War II did United Artists’ surviving founders, Mary Pickford and Charlie Chaplin, seek dynamic new leadership for the company. Their search came at a critical moment, as the traditional Hollywood studio system was beginning to decline and television was emerging as a powerful new competitor. Ironically, the effort to reinvent United Artists would ultimately lead to the departures of Pickford and Chaplin themselves, marking the end of the studio’s founding era.

Joseph Schenck. Joseph M. Schenck Productions became Art Cinema Corporation in 1926. In addition to Buster Keaton, Norma Talmadge (Schenck’s wife) and Gloria Swanson, Schenck through United Artists Studio (Art Cinema using Pickford and Fairbanks’ studio) produced scores of pictures in the 1920’s by Rudolph Valentino (The Son of the Sheik in 1926), John Barrymore (The Beloved Rogue in 1927) and Dolores Del Rio (Evangeline in 1929). In 1927 Schenck had brought in Samuel Goldwyn to United Artists. In 1933 Schenck and Darryl F. Zanuck (1902-1979), formerly of Warner Bros., formed Twentieth Century Pictures. In 1935 Schenck and Zanuck left United Artists to form Twentieth Century-Fox studio. It had been mainly Charlie Chaplin who resisted Schenck’s vision for a more comprehensive movie studio like the majors that hastened Schenck’s ultimate departure. Chaplin looked to continue the vision of United Artists for pictures that reflected the specialized talents of its independent creators (see – Tino Balio, “Stars in Business: The Founding of United Artists.” in The American Film Industry, ed. Tino Balio, University of Wisconsin Press, 1976, p.151). Public Domain.

In 1933, Alfred Newman, then under contract to United Artists, wrote the now‑iconic 20th Century‑Fox fanfare as a commission from Darryl F. Zanuck for his new Twentieth Century Pictures. That same year, Joseph M. Schenck and Zanuck—recently departed from Warner Bros.—formally launched Twentieth Century Pictures under the United Artists banner. In 1935, Schenck and Zanuck left United Artists and merged Twentieth Century Pictures with the Fox Film Corporation, creating 20th Century‑Fox. The fanfare was retained and became permanently tied to the studio’s identity. In 1953, Newman expanded the fanfare with a soaring, widescreen arrangement written specifically for the debut of the studio’s new CinemaScope format.

Selznick, United Artists, The Film That Got Away

Meantime, in 1935 David O. Selznick (1902-1965) joined UA and released his pictures – in 1936, Little Lord Fauntleroy and The Garden of Allah; in 1937, A Star is Born, The Prisoner of Zenda, and Nothing Sacred; in 1938, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and Young at Heart; and, in 1939, Made For Each Other and Intermezzo, starring Ingrid Bergman who Selznick introduced to American film audiences. These films were jewels for UA and made a fortune for the studio. Selznick International Pictures’ Gone With The Wind should have been released through UA but part of the condition of MGM lending Clark Gable to the project was that the film would be distributed by Gable’s home movie studio.

Ingrid Bergman (1915 – 1982) was a 23-year-old Swedish actress when she was introduced to U.S. film audiences after she appeared in David O. Selznick’s 1939 film production, Intermezzo. co-starring Leslie Howard and released by United Artists. “Ingrid Bergman 1915 – 1982” by oneredsf1 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

Other Major UA Releases of the Late 1930s and Samuel Goldwyn Departs

Other notable films from the 1930s released by UA included Walter Wanger’s Trade Winds (1938), John Ford’s Stagecoach (1939), and Samuel Goldwyn’s Wuthering Heights (1939). Before Goldwyn’s departure in 1940 under circumstances not unlike Joseph Schneck in 1935 – a star producer wanting to buy in or buy out UA- he left to form his own movie enterprise after 50 critically acclaimed and money-making films in 14 years for United Artists.

Carole Lombard (1908-1942), well known screen actress shown on the courthouse steps in Carson City, Nevada, on August 18,1933 following her divorce from her husband, William Powell. A rising comedian originally from Indiana, Lombard appeared in the 1937 Technicolor screwball comedy feature film, Nothing Sacred. From Selznick International Pictures, the film was released by United Artists as part of an agreement Selznick made with the movie studio to release a dozen films in a 10-year period. “Carole Lombard 1908 – 1942” by oneredsf1 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

The War Years.

Selznick’s Successes in the 1940s

In the 1940’s Selznick released Rebecca (1940), Since You Went Away (1944), I’ll Be Seeing You (1945) and Spellbound (1945) through UA.

The Wartime Movie Boom

Seeking diversion, news information, and community camaraderie, America continued to go to the movies in record numbers before and during World War II (1939-1945). In 1938 there were 80 million tickets sold every week.7 The U.S. population in 1940 was about 130 million people and in pre-Pearl Harbor 1941 about 55 million of them (about 40% ) attended the movies each week. 8 In three years, by 1944, weekly attendance numbers nearly doubled to 100 million people – or about 75% of the U.S. population.9 By comparison, starting in the early 1970’s and through to today, the trend is very different. About 10% of the population may attend the movies each week at movie theatres.

Hollywood During World War II

The early 1940’s was booming times for the movie industry whose contemporaneous films often extolled democracy’s virtues as well as a sentimental Homefront along with providing the outright escapist fare such as Westerns, comedies and musicals.

United Artists Falls Behind and the Post-War Decline

Despite this prosperity UA’s film product was mostly undistinguished in this period and their income fell slightly from the end of the pre-war period.10 After the war, movie attendance levels dropped as people returned to start families and go back to school and work. In response, the movie industry released less product – and the decline spiraled so that by the end of the decade of the 1940’s UA was in debt and ripe for a takeover

In 1949 Orson Welles starred in Black Magic, an 18th century costume drama, released by United Artists. Welles played Count Cagliostro, a legendary hypnotist, conjurer, showman and charlatan. The film co-starred Nancy Guild (1925-1999) as Marie Antoinette and her supposed double, Lorenza, whom the Count plots to replace at the Dauphin’s side and control France. The film received mixed reviews. The photograph of Welles in 1949 is from The Third Man. “The Third Man (1949)” by twm1340 is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Lucille Ball (1911-1989) in the mid 1940’s. Lucy appeared in the stylish atmospheric “Lured,” a United Artists release, in 1947. Directed by Douglas Sirk and co-starring George Sanders, the film noir is a murder mystery set in Victorian England where 8 young women have mysteriously disappeared after answering an advertisement. Lucy is recruited by Scotland Yard to act as bait for the killer who could be one of several suspects. In the 1940’s United Artists included many lower budget and B pictures to meet demand and keep its distribution business humming. “Lucille Ball” by manito℡ is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Jane Russell (1921-2011) appeared in Howard Hughes’ The Outlaw, released by UA in 1946. From the start, the Western, with its sexual overtones, was mired in controversy so that it only gained a wide showing in 1950. Russell, playing Rio and wearing a Howard Hughes’ specially designed bra using his aeronautical engineering skill – all of which became part of the film’s controversy – ended up as an iconic Hollywood sex symbol in the process. “Jane Russell (1)” by oneredsf1 is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Notably, at the end of the decade, beyond film noir with, as Michael F. Keaney points out, “its thematic criminal content” and “Emphasis on obsession, desperation, alienation, and paranoia” that is noted for its “dark visual style,“11 United Artists’ releases contributed to the new willingness after the war and ushering in of the Atomic Age to present serious social issues in films such as Home of The Brave (1949) exploring issues of race bigotry. Produced by Stanley Kramer, directed by Mark Robson, and written by Carl Foreman Kramer and others would continue to explore these social issues in the future.

Lloyd Bridges (1913-1998) played the buddy who was killed in Home of The Brave, a 1949 UA release, that results in a Black GI (James Edwards) returning in a state of shock from their mission in the South Pacific during World War II. Using psychoanalysis conducted by a sympathetic doctor (James Corey), the Black soldier’s reaction is revealed to be the result of racial abuse by one of the platoon leaders. This serious social issue of racial bigotry in American institutions and controversial subjects was part of a Hollywood’s new willingness to confront them in popular film in the late 1940’s. “Lloyd Bridges” by YorkieBoy is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

The Post-War Era: 1950’s-1970’s.

Krim and Benjamin: A New Leadership Team

In 1951, Arthur B. Krim (1910-1994) and Robert Benjamin (1909-1979), lawyers and producers, were given leadership at UA and, based on their immediate success, soon acquired the movie studio.

A New Business Model for Hollywood

The duo unabashedly practiced the capital-producer-driven model for making movies which has since defined the film industry business model. United Artists’ visionary low overhead approach from its inception proved prescient for film production outside the once all-encompassing major studio system. Continuance of a skeletal staff which caused independent producers, notably Samuel Goldwyn, to flee from its sometime sloppy operations and no studio space – such could be leased from Pickford and Chaplin – became the de facto method to critical and box office success. 12

Turning Profit in Six Months

When Krim and Benjamin took over United Artists, stockholders gave them three years to make a profit. They did it in six months.13 United Artists devised a strategy based on financing and distribution of independent production that quickly and sustainably transformed the company into an industry leader.

Early Successes and A Home for Independent Filmmakers

The revamped 1950’s United Artists worked with producer Sam Spiegel (1901-1985) and director John Huston (1906-1987) to have two upfront hits – The African Queen in 1951 and Moulin Rouge in 1952. This was followed up by High Noon in 1952 which was nominated for 7 Academy Awards and won four. United Artists was soon working closely with Stanley Kramer, Otto Preminger, Hecht-Hill-Lancaster Productions (actor Burt Lancaster’s production company) and other free-agent actors and others wanting to produce and direct.

The Industry Takes Notice

UA’s innovative and successful business model made the movie studio run by artists for artists the envy of the film industry so that, by the 1960’s, the majors were imitating them.

Humphrey Bogart won his only Oscar for the role of the scruffy captain who falls in love with a spinster missionary (Katharine Hepburn) as they take an old steamer down the Congo River during World War I in The African Queen (1951) released by United Artists under the new management of Krim and Benjamin. John Huston’s script wisely focused on the character development and performances of the two talented leads. “The African Queen (1951)” by Wasfi Akab is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

Under Arthur Krim and Robert Benjamin in the 1950s, the company perfected a highly successful model of financing and distributing independently produced films, influencing the future structure of Hollywood.

Surviving Founders Mary Pickford and Charlie Chaplin Sell

By 1956 both Chaplin and Pickford had divested their shares to Krim and Benjamin who came from Eagle-Lion Films. United Artists then made a motion picture, Marty in 1955, that won four Oscars, including Best Picture. In 1957, a social drama, 12 Angry Men, was Oscar-nominated multiple times. There was also The Bachelor Party, an Oscar-nominated follow-up to Marty, in 1957 and Stanley Kramer’s The Defiant Ones in 1958. UA also released some of the era’s great comedies, including Billy Wilder’s Some Like It Hot in 1959 and The Apartment in 1960 which won the Best Picture Oscar. In the 1960’s Wilder did some of his best work with United Artists including, all of them box office hits, One, Two, Three in 1961, Irma La Douce in 1963, Kiss Me, Stupid in 1964 and The Fortune Cookie in 1966.

Jack Lemmon (right) as Jerry/”Daphne” with admirer Osgood Fielding III (Joe E. Brown) in Billy Wilder’s Some Like It Hot, released in 1959 by United Artists. Lemmon and Tony Curtis as Joe/”Josephine” gave the two best drag performances of their generation as Some Like It Hot marked the best in post-war comedy. “Some Like it Hot, 1959” by thefoxling is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Theatre marquee with Billy Wilder (and United Artists) comedy double feature. “Some Like it Hot” by Thomas Hawk is licensed under CC BY-NC 2.0.

Marilyn Monroe as Sugar Kowalczyk, a ukulele player and singer, talks to film director Billy Wilder during the filming of a scene in Some Like It Hot. There is no funnier and sexier performance by Monroe in her filmography. “Marilyn Monroe Talking with Billy Wilder” by Movie-Fan is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Arthur Krim with his wife Mathilde Krim and President John F. Kennedy at the White House in 1962. Public Domain.

Taking UA Public

In 1957 Krim and Benjamin did something the founding owners didn’t do and if they had the studio’s history, likely starting in the mid-1930’s, would be very different: they took UA public. Before the 1950’s was finished, United Artists was the envy of the Hollywood motion picture industry, very profitably producing films, television shows, and records.14 Arthur Krim and Robert Banjamin remained with UA until 1978 when, with others, they created Orion Pictures. From 1978 to 1992, Krim attempted to mirror UA’s success with a company that, since 1997, is a subsidiary of MGM.

“12 Angry Man” by benjami is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

In 1961, United Artists released West Side Story which won a record 10 Academy Awards including Best Picture. Producer-Director Stanley Kramer with whom United Artists first started working in 1958, released Judgement At Nuremburg in 1961 and It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World which, in its homage to slapstick, featured a Who’s Who ensemble cast of stage and screen comedians and became a box office smash.

One of the best animated opening credits in film history is Saul Bass’s effort for It’s a Mad, Mad, Mad World in 1963 from United Artists.

Director John Sturges’ The Magnificent Seven released by United Artists in 1960 – it was an adaptation of the 1954 Japanese film classic, The Seven Samurai – and a major blockbuster. It featured (pictured above) Yul Brynner and Steve McQueen. “The Magnificent Seven” by MacQ is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

“Brochure for ‘West Side Story’ (brochure)” is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

In 1962 United Artists released The Miracle Worker, starring Anne Bancroft as Annie Sullivan, the partially blind teacher of deaf, mute and blind Helen Keller played by Patty Duke, both in Oscar-winning performances. William Gibson’s inspiring theatrical play was altered slightly by the author for the screen that was directed by Arthur Penn. “Miracle Worker” by Mike Monteiro is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

Sidney Poitier (1927-2022) in 1963. Two years later, in 1965, Sidney Poitier became the first Black performer since Hattie McDaniel in Gone With The Wind (MGM. 1939) to win an Oscar for his role as Schmidt, a workman who helps a small group of German nuns build a chapel in Arizona in the United Artists release of Lilies of The Field. “1-a-patch-of-blue-sidney-poitier-1965-everett” by jamesjoel is licensed under CC BY-ND 2.0.

The studio backed major cultural phenomena including James Bond, The Pink Panther, the Beatles’ films, West Side Story, Midnight Cowboy, Rocky, and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest

It was also in 1963 that United Artists backed the first film in the James Bond 007 franchise – Dr. No. Starting in 1964, they also backed The Pink Panther films directed by Blake Edwards and Bud Yorkin. Starting in 1964, Clint Eastwood was well on his way to becoming a star by way of his UA-backed spaghetti westerns. These and other films looked to satisfy the younger movie-going demographic that increasingly desired depictions of sex and violence at the cinema.

The first James Bond ride was this 1961 Sunbeam Alpine Mk1 in Dr. No. In 1961, producers Albert R. Broccoli and Harry Saltzman purchased the filming rights to Ian Fleming’s spy novels. The pair founded Eon Productions and, with financial backing by United Artists, produced Dr. No that was directed by Terence Young and featured Sean Connery as 007. “The First James Bond Ride: 1961 Sunbeam Alpine Mk1” by Automotive Rhythms is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

UA-backed spaghetti westerns in the mid-1960’s made Clint Eastwood a star. They included A Fistful of Dollars (1964), For a Few Dollars More (1965), and The Good, The Bad and The Ugly (1966). “Clint Eastwood” by yagisu is marked with Public Domain Mark 1.0.

In 1964 and 1965 United Artists got on board to introduce the Beatles to U.S. film audiences with A Hard Day’s Night and Help. Both films were phenomenal money makers. In 1965 UA had the means to finance, at $20 million, the most expensive film ever made up to that time: George Stevens’ production of The Greatest Story Ever Told. Starring Max von Sydow as Jesus Christ with an ensemble cast of actor favorites, the film was critically acclaimed and received five Academy Award nominations in 1965. However, the film recouped most though not all of its historic initial investment.

The Beatles with Richard Lester, film director of A Hard Day’s Night (1964). The film was released by United Artists in the U.S. on August 11, 1964. It accompanied the Beatles’ hit song of the same name and became a phenomenal hit with U.S film audiences, particularly teenagers around the country who lined up to see it with their friends, often multiple times. The film starred the Fab Four – John, Paul, George, and Ringo – in a rather mundane story whose better purpose was to feature the band mates and about a dozen of their most popular songs. “Sept hard-days-night-a-1964-011-beatles-richard-lester-clapperboard-00o-cjr” by bridgevillepennsylvania is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

Later Developments and the End of an Era

A Decade of Academy Award Dominance

United Artists was ascendant in the 1960’s. It won 5 best Picture Oscars in the decade – more than any other single movie studio, a remarkable accomplishment. In addition to The Apartment in 1960 and West Side Story in 1961, there was Tom Jones directed by Tony Richardson in 1963, In the Heat of the Night in 1967, and Midnight Cowboy in 1969.

Collaborative Success and Independent Growth

United Artists was working with an array of directors such as Norman Jewison (In The Heat of the Night in 1967 and The Thomas Crown Affair in 1968), John Sturges (The Magnificent Seven in 1960), Robert Wise and Blake Edwards.15 In the 1960’s this diverse array of directors and actors and their films from United Artists found their audience although, as production exploded with independent projects, not every movie made its mark.16

Corporate Acquisition and Continuing Hits

Purchased in 1967 by Transamerica Corp. based on its film and television success, Krim and Benjamin were pushed aside for new management as UA continued to manufacture film hits such as The Graduate (Best Picture nominee) and In The Heat of the Night (Best Actor and Best Picture winner).

Financial Turmoil and Leadership Restoration

In 1968 UA’s income reached $250 million with a $20 million in profit. Yet, in 1970, the studio lost $35 million. Krim and Benjamin were restored while staff and overhead expenses drastically cut.17

Directed by Britisher John Schlesinger, and starring Jon Voight as small-town stud Joe Buck and Dustin Hoffman as down-and-out local hustler Ratso Rizzo, Midnight Cowboy, follows the pair’s unlikely relationship through the seedy, sordid streets of New York City and beyond. Midnight Cowboy won that year’s Best Picture, Best Director and Best Screenplay at the Academy Awards and both Voight’s and Hoffman’s performances were Oscar-nominated for Best Actor, though it was John Wayne who took home Oscar for his role in True Grit that year.

Midnight Cowboy was made on a shoestring budget of $3 million and though criticized for being luminous but not accurately observed, with a haunting theme by John Barry and hit rock songs on the soundtrack (“Everybody’s Talkin’” by Nilsson), the film scored over $44 million at the box office. Still, the movie studio’s new owner, insurance giant Transamerica, was not particularly pleased with this UA release and, later, its Last Tango In Paris, because of the X-rated content. It led to the insurance corporation taking action to distance itself from certain of its own films. This fissure ultimately led to an irreparable fracture with the movie studio’s longtime successful management team who were also its former owners and who left United Artists in 1978 to form a competing movie studio. Transamerica put United Artists up for sale two years later.18 On the set of Midnight Cowboy, a United Artists production, in 1969. “On the set – Midnight Cowboy – United Artists production, 1969” by dou_ble_you is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 2.0.

The decade of the 1960’s saw a precipitous decline in movie attendance. What began in 1960 with 44 million Americans, or 25% of the population, going to cinema each week was 15 million in 1970 – or less than 10%. Most of these numbers were concentrated in a few films while the rest languished. The movie studios’ search for the surefire blockbuster intensified. One or two misses could – and did – sink a studio’s fortunes. Though UA was no longer the Oscar leader, the 1970’s was a mostly remarkable decade for United Artists. It made hits such as Fiddler on the Roof (1971) and the James Bond series with Roger Moore and had three Best Picture films in a row – One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest (1975), Rocky (1976) and Annie Hall (1977).19 Significantly, in 1977 and 1979, respectively, Charlie Chaplin and Mary Pickford both passed away – and, with them, some of the last vestiges of old Hollywood.

In 1978, following Chaplin’s death, Krim and Benjamin left UA to form Orion Pictures, looking to make it a worthy heir to what United Artists had been. Their exit evolved with clashes with Transamerica since the insurance giant took over the movie studio in 1967. In 1973, as United Artists took over U.S. sales and distribution of MGM films and its music publishing business, in 1981 Transamerica sold United Artists and its film library to Tracinda Corp. Since Tracinda Corp. owned MGM, these two iconic film studio brands merged to become MGM/UA Entertainment Company with a host of subsidiaries.20

Mid-1970’s – Three Best Picture Oscars in a Row.

Jack Nicholson in 1976. Nicholson won the Oscar for Best Actor for his portrayal of grinning anti-hero McMurphy fighting the system personified by Nurse Ratched played by Louis Fletcher in the United Artists’ 1975 release, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. Based on a 1960’s novel and stage play, the film swept the Oscars winning Best Picture, Best Director (Miloš Forman), Best Actor (Nicholson), and Best Actress (Fletcher). “File:Jack Nicholson in 1976 crop retouch.jpg” by AP Wire press photo – from eBay auction ebay (auction archive) is marked with CC0 1.0.

Sylvester Stallone in Rocky (1976). Stallone was offered $300,000 for his original script but declined and counter-offered for $75,000, a percentage of the box office and the lead role. It was a shrewd move. The film made $54 million at release and won Best Picture, Best Director (John G. Avildsen) and Best Film Editing Oscars. Stallone was nominated for Best Actor. Made for $1 million, “Rocky” has grossed nearly $1 billion worldwide and spawned 8 sequels so far. “Rocky (1976)” by 7th Street Theatre is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Diane Keaton in Annie Hall, 1977. “A Nervous Romance” co-written and directed by Woody Allen won 4 Oscars including Best Picture, Best Director (Allen), Best Actress (Keaton) and Best Original Screenplay. It was the first comedy film in Oscar history to win for Best Picture. Diane Keaton’s quality costumes of baggy pants, knotted black tie, felt hat, stylish eyewear and liberated hairstyles set a fashion going forward into the 1980’s. “Diane Keaton in Annie Hall, 1977” by Beauties in Glasses (Movies) is marked with Public Domain Mark 1.0.

A Profitable Era and Leadership Transition

The end of the 1970s was profitable for UA. Though Krim and Benjamin were gone, UA was headed by Andy Albeck, Krim’s longtime assistant and the studio’s investments were reaping themselves handsomely at the box office – Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now (1979), Woody Allen’s Manhattan (1979), Bond installment Moonraker (1979) and Rocky II were all hits,

Shifting Demographics and a Risky Gamble

Although Westerns had fallen out of favor, in 1978 UA fronted almost $8 million for Heaven’s Gate. Starting in the 1960’s the film market was gearing to younger audiences. This trend intensified so that in the late 1970s and early 1980s most films were targeted to teenagers.21

Heaven’s Gate bombs, the Fallout, and the MGM Acquisition

Heaven’s Gate became way over budget and then opened to devastatingly reviews. Albeck saw the train wreck that was coming. The film was released then pulled and re-released after severe editing but was a box office bomb. Albeck resigned and UA, despite its money-making releases, including For Your Eyes Only (1981), Rocky III (1982) and Yentl (1983) was sold to MGM and became MGM/UA Entertainment Corp.

Roger Moore in Moonraker. The film was made precisely to cash in on audience demand for space adventure films that 20th Century-Fox’s Star Wars started in 1977. The most expensive Bond film ever made and its biggest money maker, the film nonetheless received mixed to negative reviews. The era of the adolescent, formulaic blockbuster had clearly taken hold at the movies. “moonraker” by cdrummbks is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Consolidation and Corporate Restructuring: 1980’s.

By 1983, MGM started selling UA assets such as its New York City headquarters as part of the consolidation process while in terms of film and television production the two jointly-owned studios under Kirk Kerlorian’s Tracinda Corp. were put in direct competition with one another. In March 1985 both studios went under one studio head, Alan Ladd, Jr.22

Ted Turner and the End of the Original United Artists

In March 1986,Ted Turner bought MGM/UA and renamed it MGM Entertainment Co. selling back the United Artists’ assets (about one third of the deal) to Tracinda Corp. Though it shared the same or similar assets, it was, from a transactional viewpoint, the end of the original United Artists and start of a new company.23

MGM/UA Communications Company

Later in 1986 Turner sold back MGM’s production and distribution assets to United Artists, retaining ownership of film libraries. United Artists was renamed MGM/UA Communications Company.24

Ownership Changes in the 1990s and 2000s

In the 1990s United Artists (MGM/UA) traded hands from and back to Tracinda Corp and in the 2000s MGM folded UA into Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures though certain distributorship, branding, and copyrights could bear the United Artists name. In 2005, Comcast, Sony and partner banks bought United Artists and, its parent, MGM, and folded those operations into Sony. The era of mega-consolidation was well underway.25

A Return to the Artist-Driven Model

In 2006, in a return to its roots as an artists’ film studio, actor Tom Cruise, producer Paula Wagner and MGM Studios created United Artists Entertainment LLC. In 2011 it was revealed that MGM bought United Artists whose brand name remains though the last films made under the United Artists banner was in 2009. 26

Changing Audiences and The Rise of the Youth Market

Since the 1980’s until today, certain UA films have been geared to mature audiences -such as, François Truffaut’s The Last Metro (1981), Karel Reisz’s The French Lieutenant’s Woman (1981), Walter Hill’s Wild Bill (1995) and other less successful ventures. But, starting with War Games (1983), the majority of feature films released in the last 40 years are geared to the youth market demographic.

War Games started as a film for mature audiences on the risks of nuclear war. Market research, however, revealed that such a serious-minded film would not be a blockbuster in the box office sense. Director John Badham (“Saturday Night Fever,” Paramount Pictures, 1977) was brought in and working with newcomer Matthew Broderick and witty script by Lawrence Lasker and Walter F. Parkes appealed to a youth market with a film about games. A teenage computer wiz uses his home computer to connect to the Pentagon and with teenage girlfriend Ally Sheedy go about saving the world from the next Armageddon. Made for $12 million, WarGames earned $124 million at the box office and, like United Artists itself, provided a formula for successful movie making that has endured through the decades. “WarGames (1983)” by Wasfi Akab is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

United Artists’ greatest legacy was not any single film but its enduring vision of creative independence and artist-driven filmmaking.

Notes:

1. Bergan, Ronald, The United Artists Story, Crown, 1986, p. 8.

2. Ibid., p.8.

3. Ibid., p.6; see – https://www.movieinsider.com/m20828/the-underdoggs – retrieved August 8, 2023.).

4.  see- Balio, Tino, United Artists, Volume 1, 1919–1950: The Company Built by the Stars, 2009 and Welsch, Tricia, Gloria Swanson: Ready for Her Close-Up, University Press of Mississippi, 2013.

5. The UA Story, p.41; https://web.archive.org/web/20220213144356/http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/metro-goldwyn-mayer-inc-history/ – retrieved 8.17.23.

6. The UA Story, p.41.

7. A Short History of The Movies, Gerald Mast, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. Indianapolis, 1977, p.263.

8. https://news.gallup.com/poll/388538/movie-theater-attendance-far-below-historical-norms.aspx – retrieved August 11, 2023.

9. The UA Story, p. 87.

10. Mast, p. 263 and https://news.gallup.com/poll/388538/movie-theater-attendance-far-below-historical-norms.aspx – retrieved August 11, 2023.

11. Film Noir Guide, Michael F. Keaney,  McFarland & Company, Inc. Publishers, Jefferson, North Carolina, 2003. p. 3.

12. https://web.archive.org/web/20220213144356/http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/metro-goldwyn-mayer-inc-history/ – retrieved 8.17.23.

13. https://www.jewoftheweek.net/2019/04/10/jews-of-the-week-mathilde-and-arthur-krim/ – retrieved 8.17.23.

14. Mayer, Arthur L., “UA at 40,” Variety, June 24, 1959, p. 42; Balio, Tino (March 2, 2009). United Artists: The Company that Changed the Film Industry (1st ed.). Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 226–227.

15. The UA Story, p. 195.

16. Ibid., p. 231.

17. Ibid., p. 251.

18. You’re Only as Good as Your Next One: 100 Great Films, 100 Good Films, and 100 for Which I Should Be Shot, Mike Medavoy and Josh Young, New York: Pocket Books, 2002.  pp. 85–86.

19. The UA Story, p. 251.

20. https://web.archive.org/web/20220213144356/http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/metro-goldwyn-mayer-inc-history/ – retrieved 8.17.23. “Big 3 Sold to UA; Plus 1/2 Can. Co”. Billboard Magazine. October 27, 1973. p. 3.  – retrieved August 8, 2023; Cole, Robert J. (May 16, 1981). “M-G-M is Reported Purchasing United Artists for $350 Million”. The New York Times, p.1 – retrieved August 8, 2023.

21. The UA Story, p. 293.

22. https://web.archive.org/web/20220213144356/http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/metro-goldwyn-mayer-inc-history/ – retrieved 8.17.23.

23. Balio, Tino (March 2, 2009). United Artists, Volume 2, 1951–1978: The Company That Changed the Film Industry. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 343.

24. Gendel, Morgan (June 7, 1986). “Turner Sells The Studio, Holds on to the Dream”. Los Angeles Times – retrieved August 8, 2023; “Turner, United Artists Close Deal”. Orlando Sentinel. United Press International. August 27, 1986 – retrieved August 8, 2023.

25. Leming, Mike Jr; Busch, Anita (September 22, 2014). “MGM Buys 55% Of Roma Downey And Mark Burnett’s Empire; Relaunches United Artists”. Deadline Hollywood; “United Artists restructuring by MGM”. CNNMoney. June 7, 1999.

26. Fritz, Ben, “MGM regains full control of United Artists”. Los Angeles Times, March 23, 2012.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A Short History of The Movies, Gerald Mast, The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc. Indianapolis, 1977.

Film Noir Guide, Michael F. Keaney, McFarland & Co., Inc. Jefferson North Carolina, 2003.

History of the American Cinema, Volume 5, 1930-1939, Charles Harpole, General Editor, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1993.

Hollywood The Glamour Years (1919-1941), Robin Langley Sommer, Gallery Books: New York, 1987.

License To Thrill: A Cultural History of the James Bond Films, James Chapman, 2009.

My Autobiography, Charlie Chaplin, Melville House Publishing, Brooklyn and London, 2012 (originally published in 1964).

The American Film Industry, ed. Tino Balio, University of Wisconsin Press, 1976.

The United Artists Story, Ronald Bergan, Crown Publishers, Inc., New York, 1986.

United Artists, Volume 1, 1919–1950: The Company Built by the Stars, Tino Balio,  University of Wisconsin Press, 2009

United Artists, Volume 2, 1951–1978: The Company That Changed the Film Industry, Tino Balio, University of Wisconsin Press, 2009.

You’re Only as Good as Your Next One: 100 Great Films, 100 Good Films, and 100 for Which I Should Be Shot, Mike Medavoy and Josh Young, New York: Pocket Books, 2002.  

An Innocent Priest, a Hidden Murderer: Montgomery Clift in Hitchcock’s I Confess (1953).

FEATURE image: Profile portrait of director Alfred Hitchcock taken in 1962 by American celebrity photographer Albert Watson. PHOTO: “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” by twm1340 is licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Alfred Hitchcock’s I Confess (1953) transforms the conventions of film noir and psychological suspense into a profound moral drama about conscience, faith, and justice. Through Father Michael Logan’s refusal to violate the seal of confession, Hitchcock examines the conflict between religious duty and the demands of the law, revealing how silence can become an act of sacrifice while guilt, deception, and public prejudice threaten an innocent person.

Montgomery Clift plays a Catholic priest, Father Michael Logan, who becomes a murder suspect because he cannot reveal what he learned about the real murderer in sacramental confession. Hitchcock’s film explores guilt, self-sacrifice, public prejudice, and moral responsibility in a gripping black-and-white noir. PHOTO: Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain).

In I Confess, a 1953 film noir by Alfred Hitchcock (1899-1980) from Warner Bros., a Catholic priest, Fr. Logan (played by Montgomery Clift) hears the confession of a man who works in the rectory and just killed another man.

For the police Inspector (Karl Malden) and prosecutor (Brian Aherne), that the killer had been dressed as a priest and other circumstantial evidence, points to Fr. Logan as the primary suspect for the murder of Villette, a prominent lawyer.

Because of the seal of confession— that is, when a person confesses his sins to a priest in Confession, the priest must maintain absolute secrecy about anything that the person confesses—Fr. Logan cannot and does not under any circumstances divulge the identity of the confessed killer though he (and the audience) knows it.

Even after Fr. Logan is arrested for the crime and put on trial for the murder, the priest does not reveal the identity of the killer but only protests for his own innocence.

Father Michael Logan hears Otto Keller’s confession to murder. Bound by the seal of confession, Logan cannot disclose the killer’s identity, even when he becomes the principal suspect.

PHOTO: “I, Confess animation” by doc_tor_matt is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Hitchcock’s black-and-white film was shot by cinematographer Robert Burks (1909-1968) who would later shoot Hitchcock’s The Birds in 1964. It is edited by German-born Rudi Fehr (1911-1999) who would go on to edit Hitchcock’s triumphant color feature, Dial M For Murder, in 1954.

The story in I Confess was based on a 1902 play by Paul Anthelme Bourde (1851-1914), a French journalist and colonialist who coined the term “decadent” for the indecipherable Symbolist poets in his native France in the late 19th century.

The film follows the play which is about a killer who confesses to a priest knowing his crime cannot be betrayed. To complicate matters further, the killer blackmails the priest for a long-ago love affair he had with Ruth Grandfort (Anne Baxter), the wife of a leading citizen, and who still loves him. For the priest, the love affair is in the past though for Mrs. Grandfort it is not.

Father Logan’s former relationship with Ruth Grandfort, played by Anne Baxter, gives Keller an additional means of exploiting the priest’s vulnerability.

A primary conflict between the actress and director was that Hitchcock, who was notoriously fastidious about his leading ladies’ appearances, demanded that Baxter dye her hair. This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it was published in the U.S. between 1927 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice.

When Alfred Hitchcock’s film noir I Confess was filmed on location in Quebec City in 1952 and released in early 1953, Montgomery Clift and Anne Baxter were among Hollywood’s most prestigious and sought-after young actors. Both had achieved major career-defining successes, yet their approaches to acting—and their relationships with Hitchcock—could hardly have been more different.

By 1952, Montgomery Clift was widely regarded as a revolutionary force in American cinema. He had recently received an Academy Award nomination for A Place in the Sun (1951) and was preparing to film From Here to Eternity (1953), which would earn him another Best Actor nomination. Clift’s deeply introspective, psychologically nuanced approach to performance, however, sometimes clashed with Hitchcock’s preference for technical precision, carefully choreographed blocking, and exact camera placement. Hitchcock reportedly grew impatient with the Method actor’s persistent questions about a character’s motivation. The tension was further complicated by Clift’s heavy drinking, which occasionally left him appearing glazed during filming. Supporting actor Karl Malden sometimes served as an intermediary between Clift and Hitchcock, whose was famously non-confrontational.

Anne Baxter, by contrast, approached I Confess from a different professional perspective. Already an Academy Award-winning actress, she was known for her discipline and versatility, moving with apparent ease between contrasting roles. In 1953, Baxter parted ways with 20th Century Fox to establish herself as a cutting-edge freelance actress. She subsequently signed a lucrative two-picture deal with Warner Bros., with I Confess serving as a high-profile vehicle for this new phase of her career.

For Clift, I Confess remains an important testament to his extraordinary talent. Despite the reported behind-the-scenes tensions, his restrained, inward-looking portrayal of Father Michael Logan has been praised for its unusual intensity and concentration. His performance gives the film much of its emotional and moral force, demonstrating how a deeply internalized portrayal could become one of the most compelling elements of Hitchcock’s filmography.

Clearly, for Hitchcock in I Confess, the priest in this situation is a highly curious figure. By the end of the film, it becomes clear that the seal of confession is a cross for the priest because of his priesthood – and though sins do not always deal with high crime – demonstrates the personified sacramental nature of self-sacrifice that is involved for the priest with each confession he hears. Throughout the film, Fr. Logan is a tragi-comic figure as he simply does not state the obvious of who the murderer is on behalf of social justice and his own innocence, but equally personifying the religious nature of living with and taking on another’s sin particularly when a person refuses their own responsibility and makes amends for it. In I Confess, the murderer has no intention of turning himself in and is content to let the priest under seal of confession take the rap in the courtroom of the law and public opinion.

Clift portrays Logan as restrained, vulnerable, and morally resolute, making the priest’s silence central to the film’s emotional tension. PHOTO: Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain)

Fr. Logan never impedes law enforcement’s investigation. He continually states his own innocence for which a jury of his peers is brought in to decide what to believe.

The sin of commission/omission – and in I Confess it is for and surrounds the gravity of murder – remains with the impenitent Otto Keller (O.E. Hasse) although his loving wife, Alma (Dolly Hass), to whom Keller confessed the crime outside confession’s seal, cannot abide by his secret.

Keller attempts to escape the consequences of his crime by allowing an innocent man to suffer in his place. The contrast between the two men is central to the film’s moral argument. PHOTO: “I, Confess animation” by doc_tor_matt is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

If, despite the seal of confession, crimes can be revealed to government investigators then the sanctuary of the law of the cross is extricated to get at evil – which is not contradiction nor improvement to the confessional box (the priest may ask the penitent for a release from the sacramental seal to discuss the confession) but its obligatory public replacement. As there is often no transparency and plenty of state secrets in and around various government agencies, this becomes no less problematical than breaking down a Catholic (and Lutheran) church’s confessional door as well as, in the United States, violating the free exercise of religion (the First Amendment).

Even after Logan is acquitted, public hostility demonstrates how suspicion and appearances can overpower reasoned judgment.

Though the jury finds Father Logan not guilty due to a lack of definitive physical evidence, the angry mob outside the courthouse is unconvinced by the verdict. They jeer and assault Logan as he tries to leave, believing a guilty murderer has escaped justice on a technicality. PHOTO: “I, Confess animation” by doc_tor_matt is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

The investigation and trial raise questions about whether legal institutions can adequately recognize innocence when crucial evidence cannot be disclosed.

Unable to bear the sight of the innocent priest being attacked, and consumed by escalating panic, the killer’s wife, Alma Keller, snaps. She steps forward to publicly denounce her husband and scream the truth to the crowd. In a frantic attempt to escape, Otto Keller pulls a gun, shoots and kills his wife, and flees into the grand Château Frontenac hotel. PHOTO: “I, Confess animation” by doc_tor_matt is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

Although found “not guilty” for lack of evidence to convict, the presiding judge expresses his disbelief in Fr. Logan’s innocence. When Fr. Logan exits the court building, he is followed and faced by a hostile crowd – “Preach us a sermon, Logan!” The prosecutor, as he watches the ugly scene from his office above, is forced to lament his actions: ”Do you think I enjoyed it?” he says, washing his hands. After Fr. Logan is crashed into a car window in the crowd, Alma, Keller’s wife, (her name means “soul”) rushes in towards the priest to tell what she knows—and which an accompanying police guard relates to the Inspector—“She said he was innocent.”

Trapped by the police, a desperate Keller tries to shoot Father Logan, completely exposing his own guilt. The police return fire, fatally wounding Keller. In his final dying moments, Keller begs for forgiveness, and Father Logan steps forward to administer the last rites and grant absolution to his own framing torturer—fully resolving his priestly duty, clearing his name in the eyes of the public, and permanently closing the door on his past life with Ruth.

Considered Hitchcock’s once most Catholic of films, I Confess is a tight drama with a truly despicable villain, whose murderous rampages do not stop. The film is ahead of its time in terms of direction – presaging camera angles, editing, pacing and themes of later international crime and psychological dramas that came to fruition in the decades ahead.

Black-and-white cinematography, visual tension, dramatic pacing, and psychological suspense reinforce the film’s themes of entrapment and moral isolation.

Original 1953 theatrical poster for Alfred Hitchcock’s I Confess functions as a misleading piece of marketing, deliberately disguising a religious, somber, psychological drama to become a volatile, sensationalized Hollywood romance. “A shame confessed – a sin concealed! This is love with the brand of Hitchcock burned in!” leans into pure melodrama with an implied promise of a romance overflowing with passion, betrayal, and scandalous secrets. The smaller tagline asks the audience a direct moral riddle: “If you knew what he knew, what would you do?” which establishes the film’s high-stakes moral dilemma, keeping the focus on a personal crisis of conscience. In reality, the movie is a dark, slow-burn, atmospheric film noir rooted in guilt and legal bureaucracy. Notably, the poster completely hides Montgomery Clift’s priestly collar in which he spends nearly the film’s entire runtime. Warner Bros. concealed the movie’s religious core, fearing from a marketing perspective that a story about a devout, celibate Catholic priest might alienate mainstream moviegoers looking for a Hollywood romance. As a standard one-sheet theatrical poster, this was displayed in theater lobbies, outside cinemas, and on street billboards in early 1953 to drive ticket sales. Warner Bros. leaned heavily on the bankable star power of Clift and Baxter, placing their names in giant red font across the bottom to draw crowds. Ultimately, while the poster succeeded in getting audiences into theaters, its heavy emphasis on sensationalized romance contributed to mixed reactions at the time, as viewers expecting a passionate thriller instead received a brooding meditation on faith, duty, and the silence of the confessional. PHOTO: Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons (Public Domain). An online search by title at the US copyright office yielded no copyright renewal. In the absence of renewal of the US copyright, this poster art entered the public domain 28 years after its US publication date.

CONCLUSION

Upon its theatrical release in early 1953, I Confess underperformed at the box office and met with a mixed, largely lukewarm critical reception. While it did not reach the commercial heights or unanimous acclaim of Alfred Hitchcock’s top-tier thrillers, its reputation has evolved significantly over time. Today, the movie has transitioned out of obscurity and holds a solid 84% fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes, widely re-evaluated by modern film historians as beautifully shot and intellectually challenging and a worthy entry in Hitchcock’s golden era.

In 1953, U.S. critics found the movie heavy-handed and slow, calling the screenplay dull and noting that the killer’s identity being known from the very beginning robbed the narrative of excitement. Most American reviewers felt the central romance flashback was unsuccessful and lacked genuine on-screen chemistry. However, Robert Burks’ moody, German Expressionist shadow cinematography was universally praised. The Catholic Church responded positively to I Confess as it treated Catholic beliefs with dignity and portrayed Father Logan as a devout priest. Yet, in 1950’s Catholic Ireland, the film apparently was not Catholic enough: and it was banned there for what censors considered its unacceptable innuendos. The film’s biggest champions at the time, however, were the young French critics of Cahiers du Cinéma who hailed I Confess as an absolute auteur masterpiece. They argued that the film’s brilliant “transference of guilt” motif and Montgomery Clift’s internalized acting perfectly captured the integrity of the spiritual isolation of the human condition.

https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/religion-and-philosophy/catholic-faith/the-seal-of-the-confessional.html

text & layout –

The Face of Angélique: Michèle Mercier’s Enduring Cinematic Legacy, 1964 to 1968.

FEATURE image: Michèle Mercier c. 1965, showcasing her classic 1960s high-volume bouffant hairstyle, winged eyeliner, and mod fashion sense. This color portrait session was captured by famed French photographer Jean-Marie Mazeau. Mercier did not achieve massive international stardom until late 1964 with the release of the first Angélique film. This sudden rise to fame triggered a surge of high-end, color studio publicity shoots in 1965 to promote her as Europe’s next major screen icon. PHOTO: “Kippa – overige foto’s Reeks 1 – Michèle Mercier” is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.

Michèle Mercier’s enduring place in film history rests overwhelmingly on her portrayal of Angélique, a role that transformed her into an international screen goddess while simultaneously defining and limiting her career. The five-film Angélique series (1964-1968) secured her cinematic immortality even as it typecast her beyond escape.

Michèle Mercier4

Promotional movie still and character portrait features French cinema icon Michèle Mercier, for her most famous role as Angélique. It was shot during the production on a film studio soundstage or a production set in France for the very first film in her breakthrough series, Angélique, Marquise des Anges (Angélique, Marquise of the Angels), which premiered in December 1964.

Michèle Mercier as Angélique is a French Italian beauty who has entered the pantheon of screen goddesses based largely on the legendary five-film role that stretched from 1964 to 1968.

From Novel Heroine to Screen Legend

Michèle Mercier, born New Year’s Day in 1939, is a French actress best known for playing the lead role of Angélique in the mid1960s film series of the same name based on the 1956 sensational novel Angélique, the Marquise of the Angels by husband and wife writing team of Anne and Serge Golon. Their mid-17th century character was based on a real-life Suzanne du Plessis-Bellière who was one of France’s most famous women from the time of Louis XIV, the Sun King. The historical Suzanne first appeared in a mid-nineteenth-century French novel by Alexandre Dumas, père, titled Le Vicomte de Bragelonne, ou Dix ans plus tard. Like the Angélique cycle, which had grown to six novels by 1961 and ultimately expanded to thirteen following the success of the 1964 film adaptation, Dumas’s novel was part of a larger series. The third installment in his d’Artagnan trilogy, Le Vicomte de Bragelonne was originally published in serialized form between 1847 and 1850.

The Search for the Perfect Angélique

For the part of Angélique, many other beautiful and more famous actresses were approached before Michèle Mercier who was little known in the French cinema at the time. Seasoned French film producer Francis Cosne (1916-1984) wanted sex symbol Brigitte Bardot to play the part, but she rejected the offer. Young Catherine Deneuve was considered perhaps too naive for the lusty role. American Jane Fonda spoke French but could an American play fully a quintessentially French role? Italian beauty Virna Lisi was too busy doing Hollywood films. Not being already famous eliminated statuesque Danish actress Annette Stroyberg from the running until ultimately Michèle Mercier was decided upon after almost losing the part to French actress Marina Vlady who at the last minute didn’t sign the contract.

Angélique

Michèle Mercier as Angélique. The photo was taken in 1964 during the production and filming of the first movie in the saga, Angélique, Marquise des Anges. Mercier is leaning against a stone wall in an outdoor or village set and wearing a peasant-style costume. While Angélique begins her journey as an elegant, wealthy noblewoman, the plot strips her of her status when her husband is falsely accused of sorcery. The tattered, dirt-streaked fabric of her sleeves directly mirrors her forced survival among Paris’s underbelly, the Cour des Miracles (Court of Miracles). The film adaptation heavily shifted away from the spiritual tone of the original novels to lean into the era’s emerging demand for a bold, free-spirited, and highly eroticized screen siren. Her low-cut corset, exposed shoulders, and undone hair visually represent her transformation into a fierce, independent femme fatale who leverages her beauty to navigate danger and protect herself.

Even when Angélique is running a local tavern in the story, she doesn’t look like a standard, gritty medieval merchant. The production team leaned heavily into a romanticized “starlet” aesthetic rather than strict historical realism.

This picture was taken in 1964 or early 1965 during the production and filming of the second installment in the franchise, titled Merveilleuse Angélique (Marvelous Angélique), which was released theatrically in 1965. The photo depicts Angélique during her transition phase from the underbelly of Paris back toward respectability. In this portion of the story, Angélique manages to escape the squalor of the Cour des Miracles (Court of Miracles) and partners with her childhood friend Claude le Petit. She uses her wits to invest in a popular inn and tavern called The Red Mask (Le Masque Rouge) and becomes a respectable independent businesswoman.

Michèle Mercier4

This photograph was taken in 1965 for the second film in the franchise, Merveilleuse Angélique (Marvelous Angélique). Within the plot of the film, this outfit represents her mourning the tragic death of her true love and first husband, Joffrey de Peyrac, who was executed at the stake in the climax of the first movie.

Not the Unknown Many Assumed

When the opportunity of Angélique presented itself to Michèle Mercier, she was a relative newcomer to the French cinema. But this anonymity was not the case for her either in French theatre arts or Italian films where before 1964 she had acted in over 20 of them.

Before Angélique: From Ballet Student to French New Wave Actress

With a father who was French and mother who was Italian,  Michèle Mercier from her early teens growing up in Nice, France, was determined to be a professional ballet dancer.

In 1957, at 17 years old, she moved to Paris which was a decision that changed her life. By 1960, when she was just 20 years old, she was acting in French New Wave film director François Truffaut’s second film, Shoot The Piano Player. 

The photo was taken in 1965 during the filming and production of the third installment in the movie franchise, titled Angélique et le Roy (Angélique and the King). The image depicts Angélique during her introduction and peak integration into the high-society royal court of King Louis XIV at the Palace of Versailles. The intricate lace gown, wide-swept neckline, and high updo heavily adorned with fresh white roses reflect a deliberate blend of historical 17th-century court style with mid-1960s beauty standards. By this point in the saga, Angélique has overcome poverty, successfully managed her own business ventures, and successfully married her cousin, Philippe de Plessis-Bellière. This marriage restores her full aristocratic status, giving her the power and position to navigate the court politics of Versailles, capture the romantic attention of the King himself, and continue fighting to clear her first husband’s name.

A Blessing and a Curse

After Angélique, the Marquise of the Angels was released —an unlikely heroine’s role where Angélique’s singular flaming red-haired beauty is acknowledged throughout—the role became a blessing and a curse for the budding actress Michèle Mercier. It catapulted her to instant stardom so that her fame rivaled sex symbol Brigitte Bardot in celebrity and popularity, but the role in five popular films typecast her and effectively ended her film career almost as soon as it started.

Five Films, One Immortal Character

Following the first Angélique film in 1964 Michèle Mercier starred in four sequels that includes Merveilleuse Angélique in 1965, Angélique et le Roy in 1966, Indomptable Angélique in 1967 and Angélique et le Sultan in 1968. All these films in the series were directed by French film director Bernard Borderie (1924-1978) and starred Michèle Mercier which bestowed upon the stories a consistent filmic world but also encased the beautiful star in a popular role that was virtually impossible to escape from.

Behind-the-scenes photograph was taken on August 12, 1965, during the filming of the series’ third installment, Angélique et le Roy (Angélique and the King) captured outdoors on the grounds of the Château de Versailles (the Palace of Versailles). Director Bernard Borderie secured permission to shoot directly on location at the famous palace and its sweeping gardens to give the movie authentic 17th-century French historical scope rather than relying strictly on indoor studio stages. This follows her survival in the slums of Paris (Angélique, Marquise des Anges) and her stint running a local tavern (Merveilleuse Angélique). In Angélique et le Roy, she has successfully married her aristocratic cousin, Philippe de Plessis-Bellière, fully restoring her status as a high-society noblewoman. This marks the exact moment she transitions from an outcast survivor into one of the most powerful, courted, and visually radiant figures in the Sun King’s inner circle.

Legendary French actor Jean Rochefort appears alongside Michèle Mercier in the first three films (1964-1966) of the five-part Angélique franchise. He plays the prominent role of François Desgrez, a sharp and clever lawyer who later becomes a powerful police chief. Rochefort does not return for the final two globe-trotting installments (Indomptable Angélique and Angélique et le Sultan), as the storyline permanently moves away from Paris and Versailles into the Mediterranean.

Directed by Bernard Borderie, the five films created a consistent cinematic world centered on Mercier’s charismatic performance.

Mercier1

Michèle Mercier was featured on the magazine covers because she was riding the absolute peak of her global fame from the massive, multi-film Angélique cinematic franchise. The multi-national movie series was coming to its grand finale, making her one of the most talked-about and highly demanded actresses in Europe. Her legacy today remains inseparable from the fictional seventeenth-century heroine she played.

This cover features Michèle Mercier alongside French dancer and choreographer Jacques Chazot on the French television and entertainment weekly magazine, Télé 7 Jours, published for April 20 to April 26, 1968. The cover coincided with the major theatrical push for the final chapters of the Angélique saga including Indomptable Angélique (Untamed Angélique) released just a few months prior in late 1967 and that had become an enormous box-office smash hit across Europe and the fifth and final movie installment, Angélique et le Sultan (Angélique and the Sultan) which had just premiered in theaters in March 1968. Because the series was actively concluding in theaters during these exact weeks, French entertainment media heavily focused on Mercier to celebrate her definitive transition from a rising star into an enduring screen goddess of 1960s cinema.

At the Height of Angélique Mania

When Michèle Mercier was featured on the cover of the April 20-26, 1968, French weekly magazine, Télé 7 Jours with Jacques Chazot, she was riding high in the latest installment in the Angélique film series, Indomptable Angélique which had been released in October 1967 and was a world-wide smash hit. In the film, Angélique discovers that her first husband is alive and travels to the South of France not realizing he is now an infamous pirate. Angélique is captured by slave traders and taken far away to Crete where they intend to sell her. In March 1968, Angélique et le Sultan was released which was the fifth and unintended final entry in the Angélique series based on the novels of Anne and Serge Golon.

The Unmade Sixth Adventure

A planned sixth film called Angelique the Rebel was announced but never made.

Forever Angélique

Following the fifth and final film of the Angélique series in 1968 the French Italian beauty went on to make six more films before her career ended in 1972. Although Michèle Mercier had always appeared in a variety of film genres—the actress played dozens of other women besides Angélique— it was for this 17th century fictional character in five memorable films in 1960s France that has affixed her into the pantheon of screen goddesses for which she receives enduring adoration today.

The role of Angélique elevated Mercier to star status comparable to Bardot in popularity during the mid-1960s. The success of the series became a double-edged sword, as typecasting restricted opportunities beyond it.

The year 1970 marked a pivotal transition for Michèle Mercier. Seeking to escape the role that had made her an international star, she embraced modern, experimental, and contemporary European films. Dressed here in the era’s trendy mod safari style, with a belted cream tunic shirt, matching short-shorts, and knee-high leather boots, Mercier looked every inch the woman of a new decade. Yet severe typecasting followed her career. Attempts to establish herself in the United States brought only limited success, and despite playing many other roles, she would remain forever Angélique, the character who made her a star and secured her place among cinema’s enduring screen goddesses. PHOTO: “hotpants-1970-michele-mercier” by Gerard Van der Leun is marked with CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.

MICHÈLE MERCIER “ANGÉLIQUE” SERIES FILMOGRAPHY

1964:
Angélique, Marquise des Anges 
Michèle Mercier as Angélique
Directed by Bernard Borderie
Released December 8, 1964
Distributed by S.N. Prodi; Gloria Film; Butcher’s Film Distributors

1965:
Marvelous Angelique  (Merveilleuse Angélique)
Michèle Mercier as Angélique
Directed by Bernard Borderie
Released July 7, 1965
Distributed by S.N. Prodi; Gloria Film

1966:
Angelique and the King (Angélique et le Roy)
Michèle Mercier as Angélique
Directed by Bernard Borderie
Released February 4, 1966
Distributed by Gloria Film

1967:
Untamable Angelique (Indomptable Angélique)
Michèle Mercier as Angélique
Directed by Bernard Borderie
Released October 27, 1967
Distributed by S.N. Prodi; Gloria Film

1968:
Angelique and the Sultan (Angélique et le Sultan)
Michèle Mercier as Angélique
Directed by Bernard Borderie
Released March 13, 1968
Distributed by S.N. Prodi; Gloria Film

Michèle Mercier in Cabourg, France, June 1988. PHOTO: “File:Michelemercier02b.jpg” by Roland Godefroy is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Beyond Town Walls: How Assisi’s Despised Outcasts Sparked the True Calling of Saint Francis in Roberto Rossellini’s “The Flowers of St. Francis” (1950).

FEATURE Image: Saint Francis kissing the leper, Zacarías González Velázquez, oil on canvas, c. 1787, 217×264 cm, Prado, Madrid. The painting is part of a serial of thirty-three scenes on the “Life of Saint Francis” commissioned for the Basilica of Saint Francis the Great in Madrid done by multiple Spanish painters. The artist was inspired by Saint Bonaventure’s biography of St. Francis that recounts this scene of Francis, dressed in the luxurious clothes of a rich knight, as he dismounts from his steed to kiss a leper. see – Saint Francis Embracing a Leper – The Collection – Museo Nacional del Prado – retrieved October 4, 2017.

By John P. Walsh

The April 20, 1949 photograph of Roberto Rossellini and Ingrid Bergman captures a pivotal turning point at which artistic collaboration, personal scandal, and cinematic innovation converged. As public fascination with their relationship intensified, Rossellini turned toward the creation of The Flowers of St. Francis (1950), a film whose central episode, Francis’s embrace of a leper despite his initial revulsion, presents spiritual transformation as the triumph over fear and self-interest. In doing so, the Italian neorealist director fashioned a work that also served as a retreat from public controversy into a world of humility, simplicity, and faith.

PHOTO: Roberto Rossellini and Ingrid Bergman – “Roberto Rossellini and Ingrid Bergman” by classic film scans is marked with CC BY 2.0.

A Photograph at the Eye of the Storm

Italian director Roberto Rossellini and Swedish actress Ingrid Bergman are seen in a photograph taken by an uncredited Associated Press photographer on April 20, 1949, during a press conference at Rome’s Excelsior Hotel. Bergman had just arrived in Italy after writing her famous, career-altering letter to Rossellini, and the announced purpose of the gathering was to discuss their forthcoming collaboration, Stromboli.

The image captures a pivotal moment. Rossellini was already celebrated as the leading architect of Italian neorealism through such postwar landmarks as Open City and Paisan, while Bergman was one of the world’s most admired film stars and an Academy Award winner. Their expressions and proximity suggest a shared artistic purpose and creative excitement. Yet the photograph also unintentionally records the beginning of a relationship that would soon become one of the most scrutinized scandals in international celebrity culture, dominating headlines and ultimately leading to their marriage on May 24, 1950.

From Public Scandal to Spiritual Retreat

Ironically, while caught in this intensifying media storm, Rossellini turned toward one of the most serene and spiritually focused projects of his career: Francesco, giullare di Dio (The Flowers of St. Francis, 1950). The film emerged in part from his desire to escape the relentless attention surrounding his private life. In place of scandal, fame, and controversy, Rossellini sought a subject grounded in humility, simplicity, peace, and detachment from worldly concerns.

Co-written with the young Federico Fellini, the film drew its structure and themes from two fourteenth-century Franciscan texts: I Fioretti di San Francesco (The Little Flowers of St. Francis) and La Vita di Frate Ginepro (The Life of Brother Juniper). Rather than constructing a conventional biographical narrative, Rossellini assembled a series of nine loosely connected episodes that celebrate the joy, innocence, and spiritual freedom of Saint Francis and his followers.

Neorealism and Franciscan Simplicity

Remaining faithful to his neorealist principles, Rossellini rejected professional actors and cast actual Franciscan friars from the Monastery of Nocera Inferiore as Francis and his companions. The production sought not spectacle but authenticity. Equally important was Rossellini’s ambition to strip away any cinematic artifice in favor of directness and humanity so to recreate on screen the visual spirit of Giotto’s proto-Renaissance frescoes of the Life of St. Francis.

Viewed in retrospect, the 1949 photograph of Rossellini and Bergman marks far more than the beginning of Stromboli. It stands at the intersection of two parallel stories: one a highly publicized romance that captivated the world, the other the creation of a film devoted to spiritual humility and transcendence. The contrast reveals the remarkable complexity of Rossellini’s career at the very moment his personal and artistic lives became inseparably entwined.

https://youtu.be/bHHH6kP3hGE?si=peIL38eajdR53KNi – retrieved January 29, 2026.

The Embrace That Changed a Life

One of the most important episodes in the life of St. Francis of Assisi (c. 1181-1226) appears midway through Roberto Rossellini’s 1950 film Francesco, giullare di Dio (The Flowers of St. Francis). In a powerful five-minute sequence (Beginning at 41:00), Francis deliberately seeks out and embraces a leper, one of the most feared and socially ostracized figures of the medieval world.

This encounter marks a decisive turning point. Until this moment, Francis had recoiled from lepers, sharing the fears and prejudices common to his age. By overcoming that revulsion and embracing the suffering man before him, he crossed the threshold from worldly, military ambition to love, humility and poverty based in spiritual commitment.

A Moment of Spiritual Transformation

Following the embrace, Francis collapses to the ground in tears and cries out, “My God, my Lord and my all! O great God!” The emotional outpouring signals a profound inner conversion. What begins as an act of compassion becomes an encounter with the divine.

For Francis, embracing the leper means more than helping someone in need. It represents the conquest of his own fear, pride, and self-interest. The rich young man from Assisi discovers a new path rooted in humility, love, and obedience to God.

The Bridge Between Two Lives

Historically and spiritually, the embrace of the leper forms the bridge between Francis’s failed military and worldly aspirations and his lifelong dedication to radical poverty, humility, and service. In Christian tradition, it is the pivotal catalyst of his transformation, the moment when he turns away from status and ambition and begins the journey that would make him one of the most beloved saints in history.

Rossellini captures this episode as the emotional and spiritual center of The Flowers of St. Francis. By portraying Francis’s willingness to embrace society’s most vulnerable outcast, the film affirms that true conversion begins not with power or achievement, but with the courage to overcome fear and recognize the dignity and humanity of others.

Is the film scene historically accurate?

The event of the embrace is historically accurate though dramatized in Rossellini’s film after Francis’s brotherhood is established. Rather, in history it occurred at the beginning of the Italian saint’s conversion – in fact, was its cause. This is an important distinction since the embrace was most significant for St. Francis. It could even be argued that without Francis’s embrace of the leper, there would be no St. Francis of Assisi at all.

In Francis’s own Testament written in 1225—one year before his death at 44 or 45 years old—the saint stated directly that his embrace of the leper became the cause of his conversion.

For a rich young man such as Francis in medieval Europe who, during an age of many French popes, sought chivalric glory in military arms, he naturally spurned the contagion of leprosy that was an incurable disease and diligently avoided lepers. As Francis put it, when he embraced the leper he “exercised mercy” to him as Francis bridged his natural ambition and religious doubt with trust in God’s grace by embracing Assisi’s despised.

In that way, the leper— a common sight throughout medieval Europe and one that readily filled the lighthearted Francis with horror—became the astonishing means for the saint’s conversion of faith.

Special order of knights founded by pope cared for lepers in Italy.

In thirteenth-century Europe, by law lepers had to live apart from the rest of society owing to their contagious infectious disease.

As early as the 6th century under Pope St. Symmachus (495–514) there were general hospitals in Rome that cared for lepers though a network of specialized leper houses became more prevalent by the 11th-century. In 1130, the hospitaller and military Order of Saint Lazarus was established so that at the Third Lateran Council in 1179, two or three years before St. Francis’s birth, Pope Alexander III helped formalize the church’s role in the care of lepers, emphasizing their separation for care rather than mere social isolation.

St. Thomas Becket takes leave of Pope Alexander III in the autumn of 1165. 13th century miniature attributed to Matthew Paris, British Library. Public domain.

In the time period that Rossellini’s poignant film scene is set — it is either 1205 or 1206—there existed in Europe tens of thousands of church-run “hospitals” for lepers. One such leper hospital was a short walk outside Assisi’s town walls. Called San Salvatore delle Pareti, the leper hospital near Assisi that began to intrigue a young Francis is today a farm field.

Before his famous encounter of embracing the leper, Francis —then around 24 years old—had to work up gradually to the crucial moment of embracing a leper.

After Francis gave up his several quests to be a soldier, he returned to Assisi disappointed and disenchanted. Though he found refuge in the embrace of family and childhood friends, the same impulses that led Francis to abandon a military career even before it started, now prompted him to walk beyond the comforts of Assisi’s walls onto the road that led to the leper hospital.

Young Francis visits the leper hospital — and it changes his life.

Near the hospital, Francis interacted very tentatively, first with those caring for lepers —a charitable church activity first recognized by Pope Gregory the Great (540-604 CE)—and then at times with the lepers themselves. 

Miniature of Gregory the Great writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, in a 12th-century copy of his Dialogues, British Library, London. Public Domain.

Come la notte Francesco pregando nella selva incontro il lebbroso —or, in English, “How St. Francis praying one night meets a leper.” This specific historical and cinematic moment represents the bridge between Francis’s failed worldly, military ambitions and his lifelong commitment to love, humility and poverty based in spiritual commitment.

The Flowers of St Francis Trailer – retrieved January 29, 2026

To start, it was the sickening smell peculiar to the leper hospital wafting into Francis’s nostrils that made him flee.

But as his visits continued Francis—who by now was living as a hermit— journeyed to the leper hospital to leave them a charitable gift. After leaving it on the roadside, Francis vanished as bell-clanging lepers appeared.

It took Francis many more visits to the leper hospital as well as, in solitude, dwelling on his own thoughts and prayers to finally reach what he believed was God’s answer for him.

As clearly dramatized in Roberto Rossellini’s wonderful film, Francis discovered a deeper courage and confidence in himself—and in the same moment a supernatural faith— when along the road to the leper hospital he stepped up to leave for the leper the charitable embrace of one of the rich sons of Assisi.

Yet, following that encounter, Francis realized that the leper had given him a gift also.

After that Francis was free to profoundly pursue whatever track God called him to run. Francis could now be called to renounce the world’s riches. He married his “Lady Poverty” in their joyous mystical marriage so that even today, in the 21st century, poverty remains a major Franciscan charism. Francis and Lady Poverty have been married for over 800 years.  

Following a lifetime spent in heroic Franciscan mendicancy, this world-famous Umbrian saint “Francesco” proclaimed to his Franciscan family and the world that it was at that exact moment when he embraced the leper—and the leper embraced him—that a life in and for God truly started.

St. Francis of Assisi has the indelible mark of the leper. He conquered fear and embraced the other in love no matter how godforsaken. Done in the context of divine trust and love, that faith-filled action set each man free.

SOURCE: St Francis of Assisi: A Biography by Johannes Jørgensen (1912). Translated from the Danish with the author’s sanction by T. O’Conor Sloane, Image books, 1955.

Sassetta (c.1392-c.1451), St. Francis in Ecstasy, back of the Sansepolcro altarpiece, 1437-44, Panel, 80 3/4 x 48 inches. Villa I Tatti, Florence.

Golden Halos & Painted Nails: The Photographers Behind Marlene Dietrich, Elizabeth Taylor, and Lana Turner.

FEATURE image: The 1947 Hollywood glamour portrait of Marlene Dietrich, photographed by A.L. “Whitey” Schafer, Paramount Pictures’ head of still photography since 1941. Photo Credit: Photograph by A.L. “Whitey” Schafer / Paramount Pictures (1947). Status: Public Domain. This image is a Hollywood publicity still distributed freely to the press without a copyright notice, subsequently failing to meet statutory registration and renewal requirements under pre-1978 U.S. copyright law.

In the 1930s and 1940s, the Hollywood “glamour machine” relied on innovative studio photographers like A.L. “Whitey” Schafer and László Willinger to systematically transform actresses into larger-than-life, idealized icons.

This portrait of A.L. “Whitey” Schafer dates from about May 1936 and was taken by an unknown photographer. Captured shortly after Schafer’s appointment as head of Columbia Pictures’ still photography department, the image reflects his rising stature within the industry. He had assumed the position at Columbia in 1935 following the death of department chief William Fraker. As was customary for newly promoted studio executives, Schafer sat for a series of professional publicity portraits created by fellow photographers in the studio’s own portrait gallery. The photograph presents Schafer as not merely a technician behind the camera but conveys his personal warmth as one of the key visual architects of Hollywood’s star-making machinery during the studio era. Photo Credit: Photographer Unknown / Columbia Pictures (May 1936). Status: Public Domain. This image is an official studio promotional portrait distributed freely to trade publications and the press without a formal copyright notice or subsequent registration.

Born in in Salt Lake City and growing up in California, A.L. “Whitey” Schafer ran the leading portrait gallery at Columbia in the 1930’s and early 1940’s. His work contributed to the emerging stardom of Rita Hayworth. “Whitey” Schafer was one of Hollywood’s elite studio photographers, becoming head of Paramount’s still photography department in 1941. A visionary technician as well as an accomplished artist, Schafer wrote extensively about photographic lighting and portrait design, publishing his influential manual Portraiture Simplified in 1941. He believed that successful portraiture depended upon disciplined composition, arguing that a portrait was much like a symphony, with every element supporting a single focal point. For Schafer, that center of interest was always the subject’s head, and the highest light in the image should direct the viewer’s eye there.

That philosophy is evident in his celebrated 1947 portrait of Marlene Dietrich, where a carefully placed key light transforms her blonde hair into a radiant halo, separating her from the background and drawing immediate attention to her face. The result is both technically precise and emotionally compelling, demonstrating Schafer’s mastery of the glamour style that defined Hollywood’s Golden Age.

“Whitey” Schafer wrote an important book on glamour photography

Photographer A. L. “Whitey” Schafer started shooting stills in 1923 and continued in that line of work at Columbia Pictures when he moved there in 1932. Personally outgoing, Schafer was appointed head of the still photography department at Columbia in 1935. In the 1940’s Shafer wrote copiously on his craft and advocated for techniques in glamour photography that are seen in this Dietrich color portrait.

In 1941 Schafer published Portraiture Simplified, a book in which he argues that “portraiture’s purpose is the realization of character realistically.” Among his technical observations Schafer wrote elsewhere that “composing a portrait is comparable to writing a symphony. There must be a center of interest, and in all portraits this naturally must be the head, or your purpose is defeated. Therefore, the highest light should be on the head.” Author’s photograph.

In 1941 Schafer replaced Eugene Richee (1896-1972) as department head of still photography at Paramount Studios. Schafer remained in that position where he photographed the stars until he died at 49 years old in an accident in 1951.

MARLENE DIETRICH

Marlene Dietrich. Paramount, 1947. Photograph by A.L. “Whitey” Schafer. Public Domain.

The 1947 Hollywood glamour portrait of Marlene Dietrich (1901, Berlin – 1992, Paris), photographed by Paramount Pictures’ head of still photography A.L. “Whitey” Schafer, perfectly captures the intersection of postwar studio publicity, advanced color-imaging technology, and the meticulous construction of screen mythology. By 1947, the forty-six-year-old Dietrich was mounting a major cinematic comeback after years devoted to entertaining Allied troops during World War II. The image was created to promote her return film, Golden Earrings (1947), Paramount’s romantic spy thriller so-starring Ray Milland and one of the most important projects of her postwar career.

Produced using the tri-chrome Cabro process to simulate the rich visual impact of Technicolor, the portrait reveals the dramatic reinvention of Dietrich’s screen image. Gone is much of the shadow-drenched femme fatale persona associated with her celebrated 1930s collaborations with director Josef von Sternberg. In its place stands a radiant, golden-haloed blonde wearing a green turtleneck sweater whose precisely penciled arc eyebrows, lifted in a knowing, seductive expression, project confidence and sophistication. High, sculpted cheekbones, luminous skin, and vivid red lipstick matched to her polished fingernails create striking accents of color that reinforce both glamour and modernity.

Historically, the photograph marks a crucial turning point in Dietrich’s career. It demonstrated that her unique screen magnetism could transition seamlessly from the classic black-and-white era into the vibrant color culture of the postwar entertainment industry. At the same time, it remains a textbook example of Schafer’s mastery of Hollywood commercial photography, illustrating how a single carefully engineered image could reposition an established actress not as a fading star, but as a timeless contemporary icon.

The film’s song, “Golden Earrings,” with music by Victor Young (1900-1956) and lyrics by Ray Evans (1915-2007) and Jay Livingston (1915-2001) was sung in the movie by actor Murvyn Vye (1915-1976). It was a hit recording in 1947-48 by Peggy Lee. See- https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1633213/m1/#track/4

1940s blondes

Like other leading ladies in the 1940’s, the Hollywood glamour machine transformed Dietrich into a golden-haloed blond which accentuated her magnificent cheekbones and sultry eyes under penciled-arc eyebrows and painted nails that A.L. “Whitey” Schafer’s color portrait makes evident.

It was also in 1947—the same year that the photograph was made— that Dietrich received the Medal of Freedom. Dietrich called it her life’s proudest achievement.

While Golden Earrings was a decent film, its main purpose was to provide the actress with a job. It led into her next project—the 1948 American romantic comedy A Foreign Affair directed by Billy Wilder. That film made Dietrich a top star again.

From Paramount Pictures, A Foreign Affair is a 1948 American romantic comedy-drama film directed by Billy Wilder. The film made Marlene Dietrich a top star in the post-war years.

Following Dietrich’s meteoric rise at Paramount Pictures starting in 1930 her acting parts later stagnated as film directors —including Josef von Sternberg and others—seemed to use her more as a piece of expensive cinematic scenery than as a serious dramatic actress.

ELIZABETH TAYLOR

Elizabeth TAYLOR 1949

1949 color portrait of Elizabeth Taylor, taken by photographer Hymie Fink for M-G-M, represents the dawn of her transition from a beloved child star into Hollywood’s definitive adult beauty. Photo Credit: Photograph by Hymie Fink / M-G-M (1949). Status: Public Domain. This image is a Hollywood studio promotional handout distributed widely to the press without a formal copyright notice or subsequent registration under pre-1978 U.S. copyright law.

In 1949, Elizabeth Taylor was only 17 years old, yet she had already spent nearly a decade before the cameras. After making her film debut at age ten, she spent the 1940s under contract to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, growing up before the public eye.

By the end of the decade, M-G-M’s powerful publicity machine recognized that Taylor possessed a striking beauty that seemed far beyond her years. Determined to transition her from celebrated child star to adult leading lady, the studio staged a series of glamorous portrait sessions that showcased her most distinctive features. Though not especially known for projecting a warm or gentle personal demeanor, Taylor could be photographed in ways that softened and refined her public image carefully constructed by the studio. Through dramatic lighting, rich color photography, elegant jewelry, and sophisticated gowns, photographers emphasized her legendary violet-blue eyes and luxuriant dark hair, presenting her not as a teenager but as Hollywood’s newest screen beauty.

In 1950 Elizabeth Taylor co-starred in Father of the Bride, M-G-M’s comedy film that was nominated for three Academy Awards. It was directed by Vincente Minnelli.

Portraits such as this one by Hymie Fink were part of a calculated effort to prepare audiences for Taylor’s next chapter. That campaign culminated in her breakthrough adult role as Kay Banks in Vincente Minnelli’s hit comedy Father of the Bride (1950). The young actress whom moviegoers had watched mature on screen was now being introduced as a poised and romantic leading woman, ready to enter a new phase of stardom at the dawn of the 1950s.

By prioritizing high-contrast lighting, bold colorization, and curated personal archetypes over realistic character study, these pioneering still photographers manufactured the enduring, sensuous visual mythology of the Golden Age star.

WHO IS HYMIE FINK? HIS IDENTITY REMAINS A MYSTERY

Who was Elizabeth Taylor’s photographer, Hymie Fink? Was Hymie Fink a studio photographer? Freelancer? Pseudonym for an unknown talent or combination of unknown talents?

Unlike studio heads like Whitey Schafer or László Willinger, Hymie Fink is a mysterious figure in Hollywood history. His name consistently appeared alongside the industry’s biggest stars from the late 1930s until his sudden death in the mid-1950s.

His name appears among the stars starting in the late 1930’s until his death. It was announced by Hedda Hopper when she ended her newspaper gossip column for September 28, 1956, with the epitaph: “Hymie Fink, one of the sweetest men in Hollywood, died of a heart attack on Jane Wyman’s TV set. Hymie photographed every star and every major event in (Hollywood) for twenty-five years.”

Fink was celebrated as an exceptionally warm, ubiquitous presence in the film community. His lens captured Taylor with an intimate, soft, yet vibrant quality that perfectly bridged the gap between raw star power and youthful innocence.

Hedda Hopper (1885-1966) was a powerful voice in Hollywood whose gossip columns were read by tens of millions. PHOTO: “Hedda Hopper” by Baron Adolph de Meyer, 1 Sep 1868 – 6 Jan 1946 is marked with CC0 1.0.

LANA TURNER

Lana Turner. 1939.

This 1939 color portrait of Lana Turner, taken by Hungarian-born photographer László Willinger for M-G-M, captures a fascinating and brief transitional moment in the actress’s early career before she became a household name. Photo Credit: Photograph by László Willinger / M-G-M (1939). Status: Public Domain. This image is a Hollywood studio promotional handout distributed freely to the press without a formal copyright notice or subsequent registration under pre-1978 U.S. copyright law.

Though pop culture legend remembers Lana Turner as the definitive platinum blonde of the 1940s, this unretouched 1939 photograph catches her at 18 years old as a striking redhead from Idaho named Julia Jean Turner.

Lana Turner had been discovered three years earlier at 15 years old. Her legendary discovery in a malt shop near Hollywood High School where she was a student, has entered the annals of show-biz mythology. After William R. Wilkerson (publisher of The Hollywood Reporter) spotted a 15-year-old Turner at the Top Hat Malt Shop, he referred her directly to legendary actor-turned-talent-agent Zeppo Marx. Marx did not sign her to a film contract himself; instead, he acted as her representative and immediately brought her into an interview with director Mervyn LeRoy. The immediate result of her discovery was a movie contract at Warner Bros. This is where she made her quick, star-making debut in They Won’t Forget (1937) – and audiences didn’t.

“America’s Sweater Sweetheart”

The title of Lana Turner’s first film in 1937 for Warner Brothers was They Won’t Forget. The title proved prophetic for Lana Turner’s Hollywood career as she went on to make over 50 glamorous films, most of them at M-G-M.

Lana Turner was only 16 years old when she made her film debut in a role totaling barely five minutes of screen time. Yet a brief scene of little more than 20 seconds, in which she walked down a sidewalk wearing a tight-fitting sweater and cocked beret, transformed her into an overnight sensation and one of Hollywood’s first modern sex symbols. The impact of that fleeting appearance was so great that gossip columnist Walter Winchell (1897-1972) christened Turner “America’s Sweater Sweetheart.” More importantly, it demonstrated Hollywood’s extraordinary ability to manufacture stardom through a single carefully crafted image. For the next twenty years, numerous actresses would adopt similar wardrobe styles in the hope of achieving the same sudden breakthrough that launched Turner’s career.

Walter Winchell was an influential newspaper gossip columnist and radio news commentator. PHOTO: “Walters Winchell Julius 1” by Goosefriend is licensed under CC BY 2.0.

László Willinger 

Hungarian-born photographer László Willinger started his professional career in Vienna, Austria. He left Europe for America in 1937 where he joined M-G-M that same year. Soon after, he made his lush shot of 18-year-old Lana Turner in a silky green dress seated on a red divan (or chair) with her head turned and looking to one side with slightly bloodshot eyes.

Willinger’s color portrait of red-headed Lana Turner emphasizes the sensuality of her personality manifested in her full red sensuous lips and painted nails. In 1944, László Willinger left MGM and established his own photography studio in Hollywood. For the next 40 years he successfully practiced his craft among the Hollywood set.

László Willinger’s portrait photography career of film stars and celebrities started in 1937. Public Domain.

New Jean Harlow?

Turner did not arrive at MGM until 1938. When Mervyn LeRoy left Warner Bros. to accept a high-paying executive producer position at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, he brought his young protégée right along with him. MGM subsequently bought out her contract, bumped her weekly salary, and began heavily promoting her as their new rising siren. Turner was under contract with M-G-M at this exact moment in 1939 when the studio’s powerful “glamour machine” was actively trying to groom her to become the next Jean Harlow. The star image engineered by Willinger here leans heavily into intense, mature sensuality rather than teenage innocence. Lana Turner followed the sex-bomb script to full force in 1941 when the studio dyed her hair whitish blonde for Ziegfeld Girl. Lana, co-starring with Judy Garland and Hedy Lamarr, stole the show. 

The video features the unforgettable staircase climax from Ziegfeld Girl (1941) that transformed Lana Turner into a top tier M-G-M star as she delivers one of the defining moments of Hollywood melodrama. Turner plays Sheila Regan, a humble department store elevator operator transformed almost overnight into a glamorous star of the Ziegfeld Follies. Yet the success that promises everything ultimately takes everything from her. Drawn into a world of wealth, luxury, and excess, Sheila loses her career, her health, and the love of Gilbert, played by James Stewart. Terminally ill and nearly destitute, she slips away from her sickbed to attend the opening night performance of a friend, watching from the shadows of a theater balcony.

As she prepares to leave, the strains of her signature number, “You Stepped Out of a Dream,” drift through the theater. Bent with exhaustion and grief, Sheila clings to the railing, seemingly defeated. Then instinct takes over. Conditioned by years of performing, she straightens her posture, lifts her chin, and once again becomes the perfect Ziegfeld showgirl. Clad in a stunning black gown and trailing a fur coat behind her, she glides down the grand staircase with breathtaking poise and hypnotic elegance. For a few fleeting moments, the audience sees the star she once was.

But it is her final performance. The instant she reaches the lobby floor, the illusion vanishes. Her failing heart gives out, and she collapses. The scene crystallizes the film’s central message: that fame, when pursued at the expense of love, happiness, and authenticity, can exact a devastating price.

The sequence also proved pivotal in Lana Turner’s real-life career. Her commanding presence during the staircase descent overshadowed even fellow stars Hedy Lamarr and Judy Garland, convincing MGM executives that Turner possessed the screen power of a major leading lady. The moment became one of classic Hollywood’s most celebrated images. For years afterward, whenever Turner entered fashionable nightclubs, orchestras would often greet her by playing “You Stepped Out of a Dream,” forever linking the actress to the role that elevated her into the highest ranks of stardom.

A 1941 black-and-white promotional portrait of Lana Turner, captured by MGM staff photographer Eric Carpenter for the musical drama Ziegfeld Girl, represents a definitive structural pivot in her career. This shot formally buried her old overnight moniker as “America’s Sweater Sweetheart” from her Warner Bros. discovery days. Carpenter treats her body as a living sculpture, cementing a manufactured archetype of smoldering elegance and peak dramatic star power. This is the exact moment Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer fully initiated her transformation into a classic Hollywood goddess. Photo Credit: Photograph by Eric Carpenter / M-G-M (1941). Status: Public Domain. This image is a Hollywood studio promotional handout distributed freely to the press without a formal copyright notice or subsequent registration under pre-1978 U.S. copyright law.

Conclusion

Ultimately, whether using László Willinger’s saturated jewel tones or Eric Carpenter’s sculpted black-and-white shadows, Golden Age Hollywood operated on a singular commercial mandate: manufacturing desire to sell movie tickets. As technologies shifted and public tastes evolved from pre-war vamps to post-war modern sirens, studio titans strategically engineered the changing visual archetypes of Marlene Dietrich, Elizabeth Taylor, and Lana Turner. By leveraging advanced color processes and dramatic gallery lighting, pioneering photographers transformed ordinary talent into untouchable cinematic deities. These meticulously curated glamour portraits did more than just attract eyeballs; they constructed an enduring visual mythology that remains the gold standard of stardom today.